Reeves Has Fucked The Economy

 

Rachel Reeves' recent budget has been nothing short of a catastrophe for the UK economy. The latest GDP figures, which show a meagre growth of just 0.1% in the third quarter (with a fall of 0.1% in September), are a stark reminder of the disastrous impact of her fiscal policies. Despite her promises of economic stability and growth, the reality is that Reeves' budget has done more harm than good.

A Budget Built on False Promises

Reeves' budget was supposed to be a turning point for the UK economy, but it has turned out to be a colossal failure. Her plans to raise taxes by £40 billion and increase national insurance contributions for employers have stifled economic growth and burdened businesses. The promised benefits of these measures have yet to materialise, leaving the economy in a worse state than before.

Crushing Business Confidence

The uncertainty surrounding Reeves' budget has had a chilling effect on business confidence. Companies have been hesitant to invest and expand, fearing the impact of higher taxes and increased regulation. This lack of confidence has been reflected in the dismal GDP figures, with the economy growing at a snail's pace. The government's failure to provide a clear and stable economic plan has left businesses in limbo, unable to plan for the future.

Rising Costs for Households

Reeves' budget has also hit households hard. The increase in national insurance contributions and other taxes has left families with less disposable income, exacerbating the cost-of-living crisis. The promised relief measures, such as the increase in the minimum wage, have been insufficient to offset the financial strain on households. As a result, consumer spending has stagnated, further dragging down economic growth.

A Bleak Economic Outlook

The latest GDP figures paint a grim picture of the UK's economic future. With growth stalling and inflationary pressures mounting, the outlook is bleak. Reeves' budget has failed to address the underlying issues facing the economy, such as productivity stagnation and declining investment. Instead, it has created new problems, such as higher borrowing costs and increased national debt.

Conclusion

Rachel Reeves' budget has been a disaster for the UK economy. Her misguided policies have stifled growth, crushed business confidence, and left households struggling to make ends meet. The latest GDP figures are a testament to the failure of her economic plan. It is clear that the UK needs a new approach to economic policy, one that prioritizes growth and stability over short-term political gains.

It is hardly surprising she has fucked up, given that she was nothingmore than a complaints department manager at a retail bank and a very short term junior economist at the Bank fo England (facts that she lied about on her CV).

Rachel Reeves' Disasterous Pension Plan

 

Rachel Reeves' plot to overhaul the UK's pension system has been met with fierce criticism from analysts who warn that the proposal is a "grave mistake." The Chancellor's plan, which aims to consolidate local government pension schemes into so-called "megafunds," is being touted as the biggest pension reform in decades. However, the potential consequences of this move could be disastrous for the UK's financial stability and the future of its pensioners.

Increased Risk and Uncertainty

One of the primary concerns raised by analysts is the increased risk associated with the proposed megafunds. By consolidating smaller pension schemes into larger ones, the government hopes to unlock billions of pounds for investment in infrastructure and high-growth companies. However, this strategy also exposes pension funds to higher levels of risk. Investing in private equity and other high-risk assets could lead to significant losses, jeopardizing the retirement savings of millions of UK workers.

Higher Costs for Pensioners

The proposed reforms could also lead to higher costs for pensioners. The consolidation of pension schemes is expected to reduce administrative costs, but these savings may not be passed on to pensioners. Instead, the focus on high-risk investments could result in higher management fees and other expenses, ultimately reducing the amount of money available for retirees. This could leave pensioners with less financial security in their later years, undermining the very purpose of the pension system.

Loss of Local Control

Another major concern is the loss of local control over pension funds. Under the current system, local government pension schemes are managed by local authorities, allowing for tailored investment strategies that meet the specific needs of their communities. The proposed megafunds would centralize control, potentially leading to a one-size-fits-all approach that may not be suitable for all regions. This could result in poorer investment decisions and reduced returns for pensioners.

Impact on the Economy

The potential economic impact of the proposed reforms cannot be ignored. By focusing on high-risk investments, the government is gambling with the future of the UK's pension system. If these investments fail to deliver the expected returns, it could lead to a significant shortfall in pension funds, putting additional strain on the public purse. This could result in higher taxes or reduced public services, further exacerbating the financial challenges faced by the UK.

Conclusion

Rachel Reeves' plan to overhaul the UK's pension system is a risky and potentially disastrous move. The increased risk, higher costs for pensioners, loss of local control, and potential economic impact all point to a grave mistake. As the government pushes forward with these reforms, it is crucial to consider the long-term consequences and ensure that the future of the UK's pensioners is not put in jeopardy.

Guardian Has a Hissy Fit and Flounces Off Twitter..Except It Hasn't!

 

In a hissy dipslay of outrage and liberal tears about the elcetion result in the USA, the Guardian (favoured by the quinoa eating classes) has announced ON TWITTER that it is no longer going to post on Twitter.

Why the Guardian is no longer posting on X https://t.co/j4fRgzSYde

— The Guardian (@guardian) November 13, 2024

Digging itself further down into its own hypocritical hole, the Guardian goes on to say:

"The nature of live news reporting means we will still occasionally embed content from X within our article pages.

Reporters will also be able to carry on using the site for news-gathering purposes."

These people are so far up their own arses that they cannot even see the hypocrisy of any of that.

As I have said before, and happily say again, I wouldn't use the Guardian to wipe my armpits with, let alone use it as a news source!

Labour Declares War on Farmers

 

Just a former Labour advisor here brazenly saying he’d send riot police in to deal with a farmer’s protest and then shut down Britain’s farming industry because we ‘don’t need them’. I didn’t press him on it too much because I wanted to let it sit there like the stale fart it is. https://t.co/dgUZWXQeRv

— Patrick Christys (@PatrickChristys) November 12, 2024

 

Labour has publiciy declared war on farmers.

For why?

Labour wants to destroy the farms and flog them off to property companies such as Blackrock et al, so that they can build solar farms on some and build houses for illegal migrants on others.

It is not only an assault on the countryside and agirculture, it is an assault on the fabirc of Britain itself!

Dominic Cummings has issued a call to arms:

Spread the word among farmers: Blair's lead adviser says CLOSE DOWN ALL SMALL FARMERS because they're a political enemy. 

RETWEET so farmers hear the Labour plan The NFU is telling farmers NOT to come to London to demonstrate. 

TERRIBLE ADVICE. I've been in the PM office when demonstrations happen. 

a/ Westminster is weak as piss and 

b/ the MET leadership always fold if numbers are over a threshold - 'we police by consent PM, there's nothing we can do except manage it' Nutjobs are allowed to call for a second Holocaust waving Hitler photos every every weekend in London, SW1 ignores & doesn't cover in the news, cops just watch. 

Farmers shd ignore the NFU and cops - 

FLOOD THE ZONE, 

PRESSURE 

PRESSURE 

PRESSURE

Spread the word among farmers: Blair's lead adviser says CLOSE DOWN ALL SMALL FARMERS because they're a political enemy.
RETWEET so farmers hear the Labour plan
The NFU is telling farmers NOT to come to London to demonstrate.
TERRIBLE ADVICE.
I've been in the PM office when… https://t.co/nn2oszoAjw

— Dominic Cummings (@Dominic2306) November 12, 2024

Welby Resigns Today - In The Name of God Go!

 

Welby resigns today.

Justin Welby's tenure as the Archbishop of Canterbury has been nothing short of a disaster. His leadership has been marred by numerous controversies and failures that have left the Church of England in disarray.

Failure to Notify Police About Child Abuse Allegations

One of the most egregious failures of Welby's tenure is his handling of child abuse allegations within the Church. Despite being aware of serious allegations, Welby and his administration failed to notify the police promptly. This gross negligence has led to accusations of a cover-up and a failure to protect vulnerable individuals. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) highlighted these systemic failures, pointing out the Church's abysmal safeguarding practices under Welby's watch.

Controversial Stances on Social Issues

Welby has repeatedly found himself at the center of controversy due to his misguided stances on various social issues. His comments on Brexit were seen as overly political and divisive, alienating many within the Church. His inconsistent views on same-sex marriage have only served to deepen divisions within the clergy and laity, leaving the Church more fractured than ever.

Financial Mismanagement

Under Welby's leadership, the Church of England has faced severe scrutiny over its financial practices. The Church's investment strategies and the management of its vast property portfolio have been nothing short of a fiasco. Critics argue that more should be done to support local parishes and community projects, but Welby's administration has failed to deliver. The perception of financial mismanagement has eroded trust in the Church's leadership and raised serious concerns about its long-term sustainability.

Decline in Church Attendance

Despite Welby's efforts to modernise the Church, attendance has continued to plummet during his tenure. This decline is a direct result of the Church's perceived irrelevance in contemporary society and its failure to engage effectively with younger generations. The dwindling attendance has further strained the Church's resources and highlighted the need for more effective leadership—something Welby has clearly failed to provide.

Conclusion

Justin Welby's time as Archbishop of Canterbury has been a catastrophic failure. From his mishandling of child abuse allegations to his controversial stances on social issues and financial mismanagement, Welby's leadership has left the Church of England in a state of disarray. As the Church continues to navigate these turbulent times, it is clear that Welby's tenure has done more harm than good.

For all the good that he has done as Archbishop, it would have been better if he had never held office at all!

Biden Is Delighted With The Result

 

Mike Amesbury Charged With Assault

 

Mike Amesbury has been charged with assault.

Beaker's Net Zero Delusions Will Cost Us Dear!

 

Ed "Beaker" Miliband's delusional belief in net zero, and the consequences of his delusions have significant flaws that will have dire consequences for the UK. From increased energy bills to potential job losses and power cuts, the costs of these policies far outweigh the benefits.

Increased Energy Bills

One of the most immediate impacts of Miliband's net zero policies is the rise in energy bills. The push towards renewable energy sources, while environmentally friendly, comes with a hefty price tag. The National Energy System Operator (NESO) has estimated that the investment cost of decarbonising the National Grid by 2030 is £40 billion a year, which translates to an additional £1,300 per household.

This increase in energy costs will hit the poorest households the hardest, driving many into fuel poverty.

Loss of Energy Security

Miliband's policies also threaten the UK's energy security. The reliance on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power is inherently unstable, as these sources are dependent on weather conditions. During periods of low wind or cloudy days, the energy supply could be severely constrained, leading to potential power cuts. The NESO has warned that achieving a carbon-neutral power grid will require a "Herculean effort" and significant flexibility in energy consumption.

This means that households and businesses may be asked to reduce their energy usage during peak times, further compromising energy security.

Job Losses

The transition to a net zero economy is expected to have a significant impact on the job market. While some jobs will be created in the renewable energy sector, many more will be lost in traditional industries such as oil, gas, and manufacturing. The Grantham Research Institute has estimated that approximately 6.3 million jobs in the UK, about one in five, will be affected by the transition to a green economy.

Without adequate retraining and support, many workers could find themselves unemployed, exacerbating social inequalities.

Power Cuts

The instability of renewable energy sources also raises the risk of power cuts. Recent reports have highlighted the challenges of maintaining a stable energy supply during periods of low renewable energy generationhe reliance on wind and solar power means that the UK could face frequent power outages, disrupting daily life and economic activities. The NESO has suggested that the country will need to quadruple its energy flexibility to avoid such scenarios.

This could involve measures such as higher energy prices or incentives for households to reduce their consumption, further burdening consumers.

Conclusion

Ed Miliband's net zero policies pose significant risks to the UK. The increased energy bills, loss of energy security, job losses, and potential power cuts are serious concerns that cannot be ignored. The current approach is a delusion that the UK can ill afford.

Congratulations!

 

Reeves' Weasel Goes Pop - Budget Adds £2.5K Per Minimum Wage Employee

 

 

Pre election, the media and Civil Service went into hysteria when Tories claimed Labour’s plans would increase taxes by £2,000 per working household.

This will of course mean less people are employed and consumer prices will increase.

David Goldstone - Mr "Value for Money"

Ladies and gentlemen please be upstanding for the CEO of The Value for Money Department - Mr David Goldstone.

In a move that has pissed large number of people off, the government has announced the creation of the Value for Money Department, appointing David Goldstone as its CEO. Goldstone, who will work just one day a week, is set to receive an eye-watering equivalent of £250,000 per annum. This decision has sparked outrage and raised serious questions about the very concept of value for money.

The Appointment of David Goldstone

David Goldstone's appointment has been met with widespread criticism, not least because of his hefty salary for a part-time role. Goldstone will be paid £950 a day for an average commitment of one day a week. This arrangement has been described as a slap in the face to taxpayers, especially given the department's mandate to ensure efficient use of public funds.

A Troubled Career

Goldstone's career has not been without controversy. He was previously involved in the collapse of Ideoba, a high-tech company that failed to secure a £150,000 loan from the Welsh government. Goldstone, who was acting as a property adviser at the time, advised against providing the loan, a decision that led to the company's closure and the loss of up to 100 jobs. This incident raised serious questions about his judgment and the appropriateness of his advice.

Goldstone's involvement with HS2 has also been problematic. As a non-executive director, he was part of the team overseeing the high-speed railway project, which has been plagued by massive budget overruns and delays. Despite his efforts, HS2 has become a symbol of government overspending and inefficiency, casting further doubt on his ability to ensure value for money.

The Irony of the Value for Money Department

The creation of the Value for Money Department, ostensibly to ensure that public funds are used efficiently, is deeply ironic given the circumstances of Goldstone's appointment. The decision to pay him such a high salary for minimal work undermines the very principles the department is supposed to uphold. It sends a troubling message about the government's priorities and its commitment to fiscal responsibility.

Public Reaction

The public reaction to this appointment has been overwhelmingly negative. Many see it as a blatant misuse of taxpayer money and a clear example of government hypocrisy. Critics argue that the funds allocated to Goldstone's salary could be better spent on essential public services or addressing pressing social issues.

Conclusion

The appointment of David Goldstone as the CEO of the Value for Money Department is a costly irony that highlights the government's questionable decision-making. Given Goldstone's troubled career and the exorbitant salary for a part-time role, this move raises serious concerns about the government's commitment to fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of public funds. As the public and media continue to scrutinise this decision, it remains to be seen whether the Value for Money Department will live up to its name.

Reeves' Bad Budget

 As per Guido:

"Labour insiders are increasingly restive over the ‘dire’ comms plan around the Budget. Reeves’s team cancelled a scheduled TV interview at no notice with GB News and Times Radio – basic poor comms handling. Meanwhile, her major defensive line is that she wouldn’t want to repeat her own budget. Needs some work…

Elsewhere, the financial media has been neglected after a series of ‘curious’ briefing decisions – including a string of denials which subsequently proved to be true when the Budget documents were released."

A budget of around £74BN (tax rises and debt), that will achive fuck all other than depress wages, depress growth, increase unemployment and pump prime inflation.

Whatever Labour might try to claim, given that they sated they wouldn't increase debt and taxes, they do not have a mandate for this budget!

How To Hide a Clusterfuck - Dump Two Clusterfucks Within 24 Hours of Each Other

 

He knew about Al Qaeda immediately, he spent August lying about 'far right' and @elonmusk , he dumped the story out now so budget would hide it
RETWEET so people know https://t.co/NDERNYIXTW

— Dominic Cummings (@Dominic2306) October 30, 2024

There's a lot of chat going on about the terrorism charges levelled at the Southport child murder suspect...

Here's an attempt at a fair summary of events and what it might mean.

Starmer could be in serious trouble.
Thread 🧵 pic.twitter.com/EyAw6sQHYW

— The Stark Naked Brief. (@StarkNakedBrief) October 30, 2024

Vote Labour or Get Beaten Up!

🚨Breaking News🚨

The moment Labour MP @MikeAmesburyMP strikes one of his constituents in a taxi queue.

It appears he has no option but to resign. pic.twitter.com/6dj5QNwZT5

— David Atherton (@DaveAtherton20) October 27, 2024

 

 I'm not sure beating up undecided voters is the vote winning tactic that Labour think it is!

Starmer - The Autistic Ideologue Who Poses a Clear and Present Danger To Britain

Starmer is an autistic ideologue, who spent his youth in a communist Czechoslovakian work camp:

- He's of average intelligence (contrary to what some speculate), but is on the autistic spectrum. 

- He lacks the empathy, which explains his abrupt, sometime cruel answers (ie about pensioners). 

- His speeches are rehearsed, but he fails in interviews. 

- He lacks in sense of humour, which explains his temper when made fun of (robotic). 

- He's very rigid in his thoughts, and once he's made his mind up he won't change his mind, unless under heavy duress (giving back freebies). 

- He lacks the ability see whole systems and how they work internally, failing to see potential cause / effect, unintended consequences. 

- He focuses heavily on certain detail and ignores the rest. He's a stickler for the rules, and imposes them with authority. Anyone breaking the rules need to be punished heavily. 

- He's unashamed about the freebies, because they are within the rules, as in legal. 

- Due to low emotional intelligence (another autistic trait), he doesn't see how the freebies could be immoral, despite being legal. Low EQ also explains the monotone voice & way of speaking. 

- He doesn't hate working class people. He doesn't like any people, especially those who don't follow the rules, who he sees as inferior.

Starmer's low EQ means, he's a poor judge of character, thus he's made bad choices appointing and selecting people in positions. Due to his rigid mind set, he most likely chooses 'yes men', who then let him make these bad choices (eg Sue Gray).

He poses a clear and present danger to this country, and needs to be removed from office ASAP!

Reeves Fucks Over The Private Sector

 

Rachel Reeves’ proposed tax raid on pensions is a blatant attack on private sector workers, sparing the public sector from any financial burden. This move not only undermines the principles of fairness and equality but also exposes the Labour government’s hypocrisy.

1. A Discriminatory Policy

Reeves’ plan to impose National Insurance (NI) on employer pension contributions exclusively targets the private sector, leaving public sector pensions untouched. This discriminatory policy is expected to raise £17 billion annually, but at what cost? Private sector workers will bear the brunt of this tax raid, while public sector employees continue to enjoy their “gold-plated” pensions without any additional burden.

2. The True Cost to Private Sector Workers

The impact on private sector workers is significant. A 30-year-old private sector worker on an average salary of £35,000 could see their pension pot reduced by £13,000 by the time they retire at 67. This is a direct attack on the retirement savings of millions of hardworking individuals who have diligently contributed to their pensions.

3. Public Sector Pension Liabilities

The public sector pension liabilities are staggering. According to the Office for National Statistics, the UK government’s pension liabilities surged to £6.4 trillion between 2015 and 2018. Unfunded public sector defined benefit scheme liabilities alone stood at £1.2 trillion, or 55% of GDP. Despite these enormous liabilities, Reeves’ proposal conveniently spares the public sector from any additional financial responsibility.

4. Undermining Trust and Confidence

This proposed tax raid undermines trust and confidence in the pension system. Private sector workers are already facing economic uncertainty, and this move adds insult to injury. It sends a clear message that the Labour government prioritises public sector employees over their private sector counterparts, further deepening the divide between the two.

5. A Call for Fairness

It is imperative that any changes to pension taxation are applied fairly across both the private and public sectors. The current proposal is not only unjust but also risks alienating a significant portion of the workforce. The Labour government must reconsider this ill-advised policy and ensure that all workers are treated equitably.

In conclusion, Rachel Reeves’ proposed tax raid on private sector pensions is a betrayal of the very people who drive the economy. It is a discriminatory policy that spares the public sector from any financial burden, despite their enormous pension liabilities. The Labour government must prioritize fairness and equality, and rethink this damaging proposal.

Reeves Was "Fucking Useless" When Employed By The Bank of England

 

Rachel Reeves makes a lot of her time working as an economist. After serving in a trio of junior positions at the Bank of England, Rachel says that in 2006 she moved to the Bank of Scotland to work as an “economist,” before leaving in 2009 to serve as MP.  

Guido spoke to colleagues of Reeves’ from her Bank of England days – one described her as having a reputation for being “f***ing useless”…

Trump Is Pissed With Labour

 

On Friday I noted that Labour was fucking up the special relationship by sending over volunteers to campaign for Harris. This might be all well and good is she wins, but not so good if Trump wins (as it looks like he will). 

It seems that Trump is not best pleased at this and has filed a legal complaint to the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC) accusing the “far-left Labour Party” of breaking U.S. electoral law by sending volunteers out to campaign for Kamala Harris. The complaint, which also targets the Harris campaign, centres on a now-deleted LinkedIn post from Labour’s Head of Operations Sofia Patel. 

Patel said in her LinkedIn post last week (now deleted) that she had nearly 100 “current (and former) party staff” ready to campaign for Harris in several swing states, and that there were 10 spots left for anyone who wanted to join them. It’s not unusual for Labour staffers to volunteer their time individually during a U.S. election — but Trump’s team argues Patel’s offer to “sort your housing” amounts to a broader, foreign national contribution for the Harris campaign — which is indeed prohibited. Labour is denying any wrongdoing, and party officials insist anyone going over is doing so in an individual capacity.

Labour scrambled into reverse ferret mode after Patel’s post caused such a stink over the weekend on both sides of the Atlantic, top brass shut down the central coordination of campaigners from within Labour HQ.

The Telegraph’s Tony Diver reckons Labour could be wrong and that the party probably did breach U.S. electoral laws. Lawrence Otter, a constitutional and electoral law expert, told the Telegraph that the Harris campaign “could be sanctioned, probably through a fine, which could be substantial.” 

Advice To Starmer, Cooper, Khan and Others - Don't Kneel Again For Criminal Scum

 

#BreakingNews Chris Kaba was a “core member” of one of London’s most dangerous gangs and was accused of being involved in two shootings in less than a week before he was killed by a police marksman, it can now be reported pic.twitter.com/evj8pwClir

— PA Media (@PA) October 22, 2024

Unite's £83M Black Hole - Where's The Money Len?

In a desire to emulate Reeves, UNITE has created its very own black hole.

 

The recent revelations about the Unite Union’s £83 million hotel fraud have sent shockwaves through Labour and beyond. Under the leadership of Len McCluskey, the union embarked on a project to build a hotel and conference center in Birmingham, initially estimated to cost £7 million. However, the costs ballooned to an astronomical £112 million, with the building now valued at just £29 million.

A Legacy of Mismanagement

Len McCluskey, who served as the general secretary of Unite from 2011 to 2021, oversaw this disastrous project which was awarded to one of his close friends. The hotel, which was supposed to be a sensible investment of members’ money, has instead become a symbol of gross mismanagement and financial irresponsibility. The project’s costs spiralled out of control, raising serious questions about the oversight and decision-making processes within the union.

Financial Irregularities and Missing Funds

The scandal deepened when an independent inquiry led by Martin Bowdery KC identified a missing £14 million that does not appear in the project’s final accounts.

This “mystery” sum has further fuelled suspicions of financial wrongdoing during McCluskey’s tenure. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has now launched an investigation into the project, highlighting the severity of the allegations.

Impact on Union Members

The financial mismanagement has had a direct impact on Unite’s members, who trusted the union to safeguard their contributions. Instead, they are left grappling with the fallout of a project that has squandered millions of pounds. The union’s current general secretary, Sharon Graham, has vowed to recover the lost funds and ensure that such a debacle never happens again.

A Call for Accountability

The Unite Union’s hotel scandal is a stark reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in all organisations, especially those entrusted with the hard-earned money of their members. Len McCluskey and his allies must be held accountable for their actions, and the union must take concrete steps to restore trust and integrity.

In conclusion, the Unite Union’s £83 million hotel fraud is a damning indictment of Len McCluskey’s leadership. It is a tale of mismanagement, financial irregularities, and betrayal of trust. The union must now work tirelessly to rectify the situation and ensure that such a scandal never occurs again.

My Little Pony To Be Sacked In Post Budget Reshuffle

 

Labour Fucking Up The Special Relationship

For reasons best known to itself, Labour is sending 100 activists to the USA to campaign on behalf of Harris.

Seemingly this does not break USA electoral law and the cost of the junket is, apparently, being funded by the Democrats.

Quite why the Democrats think that 100 Brits rolling up and telling Americans how they should vote is a good idea is beyond me.

Disregarding that, the more serious issue is why on earth the Labour party think that this blatant interference in another country's election is a good idea. Harris is likely to lose, and when Trump becomes President he will not be very chummy with Starmer over this nonsense.

Rewarding Failure - New Zealand's Dictator Honoured!

 

Labour's Third Way To Austerity

 

There are normally two ways to austerity:

1 Tax rises, or

2 Spending cuts.

Reeves has found a third way:

Spending cuts and tax rises.

Oh what a time to be alive!

Reeves' Multiple Holes

 

Reeves is having some problems with her maths, as her mysterious black hole of £22BN (which was initially shrunk by the Treasury to £16BN) grew to £40BN and is now standing at £100BN.

This all very surprising, one would have thought that being the tea lady at the Bank of England would have given her a better grasp of finance!

Reeves Explains Why an Increase in Employers' NI is a Tax Increase on Working People

 

Rachel Reeves in 2021 - rises to employers’ national insurance will “make each new recruit more expensive and increase the costs to business”.

“The decision to saddle employers and workers with the jobs tax takes money out of people’s pockets when our economic recovery is not… pic.twitter.com/Zdt2QapL9J

— Calgie (@christiancalgie) October 15, 2024

Rachel Reeves’ Lies - She Will Increases Taxes Working People

 

Rachel Reeves’ recent manoeuvres regarding National Insurance (NI) contributions have exposed a glaring dishonesty in the Labour manifesto. Despite promises not to raise taxes on working people, Reeves is now hinting at increasing NI contributions from employers, a move that is nothing short of a betrayal.

1. Manifesto Breach Labour’s manifesto clearly stated that there would be no increase in National Insurance, income tax, or VAT for working people

Yet, Reeves is now considering raising employer NI contributions, a move that directly contradicts this promise. This is a blatant breach of trust and a clear indication that Labour’s commitments are not worth the paper they’re written on.

2. The Hidden Tax on Workers Raising NI contributions from employers is not just a tax on businesses; it’s a tax on working people. Employers faced with higher NI costs will inevitably pass these costs onto their employees through lower wages, reduced benefits, or even job cuts

This indirect taxation hits workers just as hard, if not harder, than a direct tax increase.

3. Impact on Pension Contributions The proposal to levy NI on employer pension contributions is equally damaging

This move would discourage employers from contributing to their employees’ pensions, undermining the financial security of millions of workers. It’s a stealth tax that erodes the very foundation of retirement savings and places an additional burden on working people.

4. Economic Consequences The economic fallout from these proposed changes cannot be overstated. Higher NI contributions for employers will stifle job creation, reduce investment, and slow economic growth

At a time when the economy is already fragile, this is the last thing we need.

5. A Call for Accountability Rachel Reeves and the Labour government must be held accountable for their deceptive practices. The public deserves transparency and honesty, not broken promises and hidden taxes. It’s time for Labour to come clean and admit that their policies are a direct attack on the very people they claim to represent.

In conclusion, Rachel Reeves’ plans to raise NI contributions from employers and on employer pension contributions are a betrayal of Labour’s manifesto promises and a hidden tax on working people. It’s time for the government to rethink these damaging policies and prioritise the well-being of the nation’s workforce.

 

Starmer Throws My Little Pony Under The Bus

It all started last week when Haigh described P&O as a “rogue operator” in an ITV interview. A DfT press release gave P&O (and its unceremonious firing of nearly 800 workers in a fire and rehire scandal) as an example of how its new workers’ rights package will protect seafarers from dodgy employers. Haigh went further and said she was boycotting the company and encouraged customers to do the same. Cue the anger.

Starmer distanced himself from Haigh’s comments as the government sought to patch things up with owners DP World over the weekend. Now ministers expected the original announcement to be part of the up to £50 billion (h/t the FT) of investments unveiled today.

Elon Musk To Be Made Minister of Anti-Regulation

 

“Maybe you need a minister of anti-regulation,” says former Google CEO Eric Schmidt

— Katherine Griffiths (@GriffithsKath_) October 14, 2024

Labour - 100 Days in Office, 100 Days of Failure!

 

As we mark the 100th day of Labour’s government, there is nothing to celebrate. Instead of delivering on their promises, the Labour administration has stumbled from one failure to the next, leaving the country in a state of disarray.

1. Economic Mismanagement Labour’s economic policies have been nothing short of disastrous. Their attempts to fix the nation’s finances have been met with widespread criticism, and their gloomy outlook has done little to inspire confidence in the markets

The promised economic revival has yet to materialise, and the country is left grappling with uncertainty.

2. Welfare Cuts One of the most controversial moves has been the decision to cut welfare benefits. This has sparked outrage among the most vulnerable in society, who are now facing even greater hardship

The government’s lack of empathy and understanding of the struggles faced by ordinary people is glaringly evident.

3. Internal Power Struggles Labour’s internal power struggles have further undermined their ability to govern effectively. The recent departure of Gray just days before the 100-day mark is a testament to the chaos within the party

Instead of focusing on governance, Labour seems more preoccupied with infighting and power plays.

4. Scandals and Controversies The administration has been plagued by scandals, including a donations scandal that has cast a shadow over their integrity

These controversies have eroded public trust and raised serious questions about the government’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

5. Unpopular Decisions Labour’s decision to deny payments to pensioners has been widely condemned

This move has alienated a significant portion of the electorate and further damaged the government’s already tarnished reputation.

6. Lack of Vision Despite their promises of dramatic change, Labour has failed to deliver any meaningful reforms. Their achievements, if they can be called that, have been overshadowed by a series of errors and misjudgements

The government’s lack of vision and direction is painfully clear.

In conclusion, Labour’s first 100 days in office have been a resounding failure. Their economic mismanagement, welfare cuts, internal power struggles, scandals, unpopular decisions, and lack of vision have left the country worse off. 

Unsurprisingly, Labour and Starmer have abandoned any attempts to celebrate and have decreed that it is for people to decide if the 100 days have been a success.

Well, we all know the answer to that!

Envoy For Nations and Regions MIA

Today is the first meeting of the Council of Nations and Regions. Yet, for reasons known only to herself and No 10, the Envoy for Nations and Regions (Sue Gray) will not be there.

In fact Gary has disappeared from the radar and is, apparently, taking some form of holiday/break whilst she negotiates a large severance package for her 3 months of work.

Miliband's Demented Scheme To Import Biomass From North Korea

 

Ed Miliband’s proposal to import biomass from North Korea is not just misguided—it’s downright reckless. This ill-conceived plan raises serious ethical, environmental, and geopolitical concerns that cannot be ignored.

Firstly, let’s address the elephant in the room: North Korea is subject to international sanctions for its human rights abuses and nuclear ambitions. By engaging in trade with such a regime, the UK risks legitimising and financially supporting a government notorious for its oppressive practices. This move is a slap in the face to the values of human rights and international law that the UK claims to uphold.

Environmentally, the plan is a disaster waiting to happen. Transporting biomass over such long distances significantly increases the carbon footprint, negating any potential environmental benefits. Miliband’s plan is a glaring contradiction to the UK’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable energy practices.

Economically, relying on biomass imports from a politically unstable and isolated country like North Korea introduces a high level of risk and uncertainty. This could lead to supply chain disruptions and increased costs, ultimately burdening UK taxpayers and consumers. It’s a gamble that the UK simply cannot afford to take.

In conclusion, Ed Miliband’s plan to import biomass from North Korea is a dangerous and irresponsible policy. It compromises the UK’s ethical standards, environmental goals, and economic stability. The UK must reject this ill-advised strategy and focus on more sustainable and ethical sources of biomass.

"Barrister Head" Get Shafted By Two Women

 

Like a rabbit caught in the headlights pic.twitter.com/JXPqdS8Axc

— #Marcher (@MarcherReborn) October 8, 2024

Rosie Duffield: 

‘Starmer is how he appears on TV – astonished that anyone dares question him’ 

 "Although, over the years, Starmer often claimed to be having conversations with her, this was simply not the case. 

She finally begged for a meeting just before the election. In the end she got 20 minutes with him. “It was utterly pointless,” she says. 

“He just looks like he does on television, utterly bewildered by being challenged, and affronted as well. He is astonished that anyone dares to question him. 

Friends in the legal profession will say to me, that’s his barrister head, because if you question a barrister, they believe you’re questioning their knowledge of the law and their absolute expertise on their subject. I was questioning him about the two-child benefit cap, and how it looked, and he just seemed baffled." 

“He is a politician who has no political talent. I did mention the gender stuff and that I had never had an apology, I said he never talked to the backbench which is the direct line to constituents." 

“The thing he said that really got to me was when he said: ‘I’ve wasted the last nine years. Rosie, you’ve wasted the last seven.’ And I took a minute. ‘What do you mean?’ And then I said, ‘Keir, I’ve helped over 60,000 constituents. It’s all recorded. I’ve done so much casework. How can you call that a waste of time?’ 

He said: ‘Well, I haven’t been in power.’ 

"Duffield ends by telling me that she likens her time in the Labour Party to an abusive relationship. “It was my party, and they have been consistently unpleasant as a group. They’ve been as unpleasant to be around as my abusive partner and that’s not something I’d say lightly. 

I will feel that sense of relief and freedom that I did when I left that relationship, but it hasn’t sunk in. So I can’t go ‘I’m free’ just yet.”

Baroness Gray Envoy For The Chagos Islands

 

Filling Found For Reeves' £22BN Hole

 

Reeves has been banging on about her mythical £22BN blackhole for some time now. Aside from the fact Labour is spaffing £12BN on foreign governments' fake green projects, Labour is also spaffing £22BN on a massively overpriced and useless carbon capture scheme.

Those projects will remove 3 million tons of CO2 per year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That would fall far short of a previous government target to capture and store between 20 million to 30 million tons of CO2 per year by the end of the decade.

If those are the only projects supported by this funding, it would represent a cost of about £300 per ton of CO2, roughly eight times the current UK carbon price and more than triple the subsidies offered in the US IRA. The decision follows reporting by Bloomberg earlier this year that the government was considering delaying some CCS projects due to rising costs. 

Stop these absurdly overpriced wasteful projects and, voila your hole is filled!

The Papers Have The Birth Certificate

 

via GIPHY

Beaker's Demented Plan To Keep The Lights On - Flywheels

Beaker's fanatical net zero obsession, that is destroying our economy and energy security, has taken a new twist today.

Conscious of the fact that banning coal, oil and gas will leave the country prone to blackouts; he intends to install flywheels to store energy and come onstream when the national grid falters. All very Heath Robinson maybe; however, it rather ignores a key point (apart from the fact it's bollocks) namely that it will require the creation of a new industry to build these things:

"The scale of the problem is shown by the number of contracts awarded for so-called “stability services” – expected to total more than 100 by the time all are operational, probably in 2026. NESO is now planning to open an entire new stability services market to encourage the construction of more flywheels or other services that back up the grid."

Beaker is intent on destroying this country, and no one is stopping him!

Old King Coal

Old King Coal was a merry old soul,
But Miliband's dreams took a heavy toll.
With visions of green and skies so clear,
He chased a fantasy, year after year.

Gone are the days of soot and grime,
But at what cost, and in whose time?
The mines are closed, the pits are still,
Communities left with an empty till.

Old King Coal, he ruled the land,
With blackened hands and a steady stand.
But now we chase the wind and sun,
Leaving behind what once was done.

Some call it progress, others a jest,
To abandon the past we knew best.
Miliband's policies, a delusional quest,
Left many to struggle, feeling oppressed.

Old King Coal, your reign is done,
But at what price, and who has won?
Miliband's dream, though bold and grand,
Left a trail of despair across the land.

The Silence Will Fall When The Question is Asked

 

Do you hear the Whisper Men?

The Whisper Men are near.

If you hear the Whisper Men

then turn away your ear.

Do not hear the Whisper Men,

whatever else you do.

For once you've heard the Whisper men,

they'll stop and look at you.