Starmer & Hermer – The Traitorous Duo Who Hunted Our Own Soldiers While Knowing the Claims Were Filthy Lies

 

Listen up, you spineless, virtue-signalling Westminster reptiles.

While brave British soldiers were out in the dust and danger of Iraq, risking life and limb for this country, two ambitious human rights lawyers back home were busy sharpening their knives. One of them is now our Prime Minister. The other is his Attorney General. And together, Keir Starmer and Richard Hermer helped unleash one of the most disgusting witch-hunts against our own veterans this nation has ever seen.

Let’s call it what it is: betrayal dressed up as “justice.”

Back in 2007, Starmer didn’t just dip his toe in. He worked for free — oh yes, the noble warrior insisted on doing it pro bono — alongside his mate Richard Hermer and the now-disgraced Phil Shiner. They pushed a landmark legal case that extended European human rights law into active war zones. The result? Hundreds of British troops dragged through years of investigations, interrogations, and public smears over alleged war crimes.

One soldier in particular — Sgt Richie Catterall — had already been cleared twice of murder. Twice. But that wasn’t good enough for Starmer and Hermer. They personally urged the courts to order yet another inquiry, sneering that the previous military investigations were “perfunctory” and “wholly inadequate.” They got their wish. The man was hounded for another 13 years. His life was wrecked. He became suicidal. All based on claims that later collapsed.

But here’s where it gets truly sickening.

Recent revelations show that Richard Hermer knew — or was explicitly warned — that many of the allegations against our troops were lies. Deliberate, fabricated, bogus Iraqi claims. Emails and documents now in the public domain prove he was alerted to inconsistencies, to witnesses who couldn’t keep their stories straight, to evidence that stank of fabrication. Yet he ploughed on anyway. He backed the claims. He helped publicise them. He pursued compensation and fresh inquiries against decorated British soldiers.

This wasn’t ignorance. This was ideological fanaticism. Human rights lawyer syndrome at its most poisonous — where foreign accusers are automatically believed, and our own fighting men are presumed guilty until proven innocent a dozen times over.

And who was right there with him? Keir Starmer. The man who now stands in Downing Street pretending to “support our troops.” The same man who, as soon as he got into power, moved to scrap protections for Northern Ireland veterans — opening the door once again to vexatious prosecutions against elderly ex-soldiers who served during the Troubles. While IRA terrorists walk free or get comfortable pensions, our boys face the prospect of being hauled into court in their 70s and 80s.

This is two-tier justice in its purest, most revolting form.

One rule for the terrorists and foreign claimants who hate Britain. Another rule for the men who wore the uniform and actually defended this country.

Starmer and Hermer didn’t just enable this. They were architects of it. They built their glittering careers on the back of smearing British soldiers. Starmer’s “pro bono” work wasn’t charity — it was career advancement. Hermer’s dogged pursuit of dodgy claims wasn’t principled — it was reckless and, in light of the warnings he received, borderline contemptible.

Now Hermer sits as Attorney General, the government’s top legal advisor. The man who knew the al-Sweady claims and similar accusations were built on sand still has the power to direct prosecutions. Think about that. The same bloke who helped hound innocent veterans is now in charge of deciding who gets pursued by the state.

This isn’t oversight. This is a national disgrace.

Our soldiers didn’t sign up to fight under rules that treat every split-second battlefield decision like a Sunday afternoon courtroom debate. They didn’t risk everything so that ambulance-chasing lawyers and ideologues could turn war into a human rights lawsuit factory.

The message Starmer and Hermer have sent to every serving member of our Armed Forces is crystal clear: we don’t have your back. We’ll throw you to the wolves the moment it suits our international lawyer friends or our desire to look “ethical” on the world stage.

To every veteran who was dragged through hell because of these people: you deserved better. You deserved leaders who understood that fighting wars isn’t the same as filing paperwork in The Hague. You deserved gratitude, not suspicion.

To Starmer and Hermer: history will record you as the pair who chose activist lawfare over loyalty to the men who kept this country safe. You didn’t serve Britain. You served your own egos and your precious human rights ideology.

And the British public are waking up to it.

Enough is enough. Protect our veterans. Stop the witch-hunts. Sack the ideologues who treat our soldiers as the villains.

Britain’s fighting men and women deserve leaders who put them first — not lawyers who put foreign complaints and European courts first.

The shame belongs to Starmer and Hermer. The debt of gratitude belongs to the soldiers they tried to break.

Labour's Chinese Spy Ring

 

Three people have been arrested today for being part of a Chinese spy ring.

One of them is the partner of a sitting Labour MP, another is the partner of a former Labour MP.

Starmer’s 17 In, 1 Out Migrant Deal: A Betrayal of Britain’s Borders

 

In a move that reeks of political capitulation and diplomatic incompetence, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has reportedly sealed a so-called “one in, one out” migration deal with French President Emmanuel Macron, a deal that has morphed into a humiliating 17-to-1 exchange, according to French media reports. This agreement, unveiled during Macron’s state visit to the UK in July 2025, is not just a policy failure—it’s a slap in the face to every British citizen who has demanded stronger border control. Starmer’s negotiation flop is a masterclass in weak leadership, exposing his inability to prioritise national interests and leaving Britain’s borders more porous than ever.

The deal, which was initially pitched as a balanced “one in, one out” arrangement to curb illegal Channel crossings, has devolved into a lopsided travesty. Reports suggest that for every 17 migrants crossing the Channel to the UK, only one will be returned to France, with a trial phase capping returns at a measly 50 migrants per week. With over 44,000 migrants having crossed the Channel since Starmer took office, this equates to a paltry 6% return rate—a figure so negligible it barely qualifies as a policy, let alone a solution. The British public, already frustrated by years of unchecked migration, has been sold a false promise of border security, only to be handed a deal that effectively waves more boats through.

Starmer’s supporters might argue that this deal is a pragmatic step toward cooperation with France, a necessary compromise to tackle the small boat crisis. But pragmatism doesn’t justify surrender. The Prime Minister’s willingness to accept such an imbalanced arrangement reveals a deeper truth: his government lacks the backbone to confront the smuggling gangs exploiting Britain’s borders. Instead of demanding robust action from France—such as intercepting boats before they reach UK waters—Starmer has settled for a token gesture that does little to deter illegal crossings. The French, meanwhile, appear to have outmanoeuvred him, securing UK concessions while offering minimal returns. Macron’s smiling photo-ops with Starmer during the state visit only underscore the one-sided nature of this diplomatic debacle.

The numbers tell a damning story. Home Office figures indicate that over 21,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in 2025 alone, a record high for this point in the year. Yet Starmer’s response is to greenlight a scheme that, at best, will return a mere 1,500 migrants by year’s end, assuming the trial phase even succeeds. This is not a deterrent; it’s a drop in the ocean. The smuggling gangs, who have adapted their tactics to evade authorities, must be laughing at the Prime Minister’s naivety. By accepting a deal that allows 17 times more migrants to stay than are sent back, Starmer is effectively incentivising the very crossings he claims to want to stop.

Worse still, the deal has sparked opposition from other EU countries, including Italy, Greece, Spain, Malta, and Cyprus, who fear France will offload returned migrants onto them under EU rules. This diplomatic fallout exposes Starmer’s failure to anticipate the broader consequences of his negotiations, further isolating the UK in European discussions on migration. The Prime Minister’s much-touted “reset” with the EU, meant to foster cooperation, is crumbling under the weight of his own missteps.

Starmer’s defenders might point to the abandonment of the Rwanda scheme as a sign of moral progress, but scrapping a policy that aimed to deter illegal migration without replacing it with a credible alternative is not leadership—it’s negligence. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has rightly called out Starmer’s cancellation of the Rwanda plan, which could have served as a genuine deterrent. Instead, we’re left with a half-baked agreement that does nothing to address the “pull factors” Macron himself has highlighted, such as access to jobs and benefits in the UK. Starmer’s refusal to consider measures like ID cards, despite French pressure, only compounds the perception of a leader unwilling to take bold action.

Social media sentiment, particularly on X, reflects the public’s outrage. Users have branded the deal a “stitch-up” and accused Starmer of orchestrating the “intentional destruction of Britain by design.” While some dismiss these criticisms as right-wing hyperbole, the underlying frustration is undeniable: the British people want their borders secured, not bartered away in lopsided deals. Starmer’s promise to “smash the gangs” and tackle illegal migration rings hollow when his flagship policy allows 17 migrants to stay for every one returned.

This agreement is not just a failure of negotiation; it’s a betrayal of trust. Starmer campaigned on a platform of competence and control, yet his first major test on migration has exposed him as out of his depth. The British public deserves a leader who fights for their interests, not one who hands Macron a diplomatic victory while Britain’s borders remain a free-for-all. If Starmer cannot deliver on something as fundamental as border security, what hope is there for his government to tackle the myriad other challenges facing the nation? The “17 in, 1 out” deal isn’t just a policy misstep—it’s a symbol of a Prime Minister too weak to stand up for Britain.

The Enemy Within - The Treacherous Nest of Vipers Working For The Home Office

 

The Home Office, entrusted with protecting the United Kingdom’s borders, is embroiled in a scandal that exposes its systemic failures and threatens national security. A recent investigation by the Daily Mail has uncovered a shocking scheme in which Home Office translators are allegedly running a lucrative scam to help illegal migrants evade detention. This betrayal, facilitated by insiders within the immigration system, demands immediate action and a complete overhaul of a department that has lost its way.

A Treacherous Scam Exposed

According to the Daily Mail’s undercover investigation, freelance translators, including one named Eglantina Legisi, are charging £3,000 to act as fake guarantors for illegal migrants, primarily Albanians arriving via small boats, lorries, or with forged passports. These translators, who boast insider knowledge of the immigration system, provide scripts and staged relationships to deceive judges during bail hearings, ensuring migrants are released from detention. Legisi, herself an Albanian migrant who arrived illegally, claimed the scheme is “100% successful” and scoffed at concerns about judicial scrutiny, stating, “Do you think the government care? Come on, please.”

This is not a minor indiscretion but a deliberate exploitation of the UK’s immigration processes. The translators’ actions enable migrants to bypass detention, live freely in the UK, and burden public resources, all while undermining the rule of law. Posts on X reflect public outrage, with users like @jomickane demanding arrests and @Olgachristie calling for a “Home Office DOGE and clearout” to address the rot.

The Scale of the Crisis

The Home Office’s failure to curb this scam is part of a broader immigration crisis. In 2024, 36,816 migrants crossed the English Channel in small boats, with over 5,000 arrivals recorded by March 2025, the earliest such milestone in recent records. A GB News report estimates that one in 12 people in London—approximately 585,000—are illegal migrants, a figure drawn from a study for Thames Water. The Home Office’s own data shows that visa overstays and undetected entries contribute significantly to the UK’s unauthorised migrant population, yet the department has failed to provide updated statistics since 2020.

 

This scandal exacerbates an already strained system. Taxpayers fund the salaries of these disloyal translators and the costs of housing, healthcare, and legal aid for migrants who exploit these loopholes. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp labelled the fraud a “disgrace,” while the Home Office has promised an “urgent probe” and “prompt and decisive action.” But promises ring hollow when the department’s track record is one of inaction and incompetence.

A Broken System

The translator scam is a symptom of deeper dysfunction within the Home Office. Lax vetting processes allowed individuals like Legisi, who openly criticised the UK’s treatment of Albanian migrants on television while plotting to defraud its courts, to gain trusted roles. The department’s failure to monitor contractors is inexcusable, especially given its history of scandals, from racist incidents at migrant centres to unaddressed complaints about staff misconduct.

 

X users have echoed this sentiment, with @tlloydjones declaring the Home Office “unfit for purpose” and @MagistratesBlog expressing shock at the revelations. The Guardian notes growing disquiet within the Labour Party over the government’s tough immigration stance, which risks alienating core voters while failing to address systemic issues like this scam.

The Way Forward

The Home Office must act swiftly to restore trust and secure the borders. The following steps are essential:

 

1. Prosecute the Perpetrators: Translators involved in the scam, like Legisi, must face criminal charges for fraud and aiding illegal immigration. Their actions are a betrayal of public trust.
2. Revamp Vetting and Oversight: Implement stringent background checks and real-time monitoring for all contractors. Insider knowledge should not be a tool for exploitation.
3. Strengthen Enforcement: Accelerate deportations and tighten bail processes to prevent fraud. The Home Office’s 2025 target of 19,000 removals is a start, but it must go further.
4. Legislative Reform: The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which treats people smugglers as terrorists, should extend to those within the system who facilitate illegal migration.

A Nation Let Down

The Home Office’s complicity in this translator scam is a national embarrassment. By allowing insiders to profit from undermining border security, the department has failed the British public. The Daily Mail’s exposé and the ensuing outcry on X underscore the urgency of reform. Every day this issue festers, the UK’s sovereignty and safety are compromised.

 

The government must root out these traitors, restore accountability, and prove that it prioritises the rule of law over bureaucratic complacency. The British people deserve a Home Office that protects, not betrays, their interests.