Title

The PalArse of Westminster

Text

Exposing the hypocrisy, greed and incompetence of our "respected" elected political "elite".

Thursday, 4 December 2025

Starmer’s Assisted Dying Lie: The Leaked Docs Prove He’s Engineered a Backdoor Euthanasia Plot to Cull the Elderly and Save a Few Bob on Pensions


 

Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive – and Keir Starmer, that sanctimonious son of a tool, has spun a silken shroud so vast it could smother the entire geriatric wing of the NHS. Yesterday’s leaked Labour policy note – straight from the bowels of opposition-era scheming – has finally ripped the mask from the Prime Minister’s pious face. For months, Starmer has bleated that the Assisted Dying Bill, Kim Leadbeater’s Private Member’s gambit, was nothing to do with Labour policy. A free vote! Neutrality! Hands off, guv! Bollocks. The documents scream the truth: this was a calculated stitch-up, a secret coordination to legalise state-sanctioned suicide via the back door, all while dodging manifesto scrutiny and parliamentary accountability.

Picture it, dear reader: while the rest of us were faffing about with inflation and winter fuel payments, Starmer’s shadow cabinet huddled in smoke-free rooms, plotting how to funnel euthanasia through a Private Member’s Bill. The leak, splashed across The Guardian and the Mail like yesterday’s takeaway, reveals they knew full well a PMB would let them exert “heavy influence” without the fingerprints showing. No consultation with MPs, unions, or the rank-and-file membership – just a sly nod to Esther Rantzen over the blower, and suddenly Leadbeater “wins” the ballot and picks this poison pill. Coincidence? My arse. This was engineered from the off, a Labour wet dream dressed up as backbench initiative.

And why the deceit? Don’t kid yourself it’s about compassion or dignity in death. This is fiscal vampirism, pure and simple. Labour’s bean-counters – those grey men in the Treasury who dream in spreadsheets – have long eyed the NHS’s £180 billion black hole and the state pension bill ballooning to £120 billion by 2030. Who’s the biggest drain? The old dears, bless ’em: 12 million over-65s sucking up £70 billion in health and social care alone, with winter fuel allowances tossed in like confetti at a funeral. Starmer’s mob genuinely wants to kill off the “burdensome” brigade – not with a bang, but with a quiet prescription for pentobarbital and a pat on the head. It’s eugenics lite, wrapped in the language of choice, designed to thin the herd and plug the fiscal gap. Every grey vote shuffled off this mortal coil saves a fortune in hip replacements and dementia wards. Compassion? It’s cost-cutting with a stethoscope.

This isn’t hyperbole; it’s the grotesque logic of a government that’s already slashed winter fuel for the vulnerable and eyed means-testing pensions like a fox in the henhouse. The leaked note doesn’t just expose the lie – it lays bare the motive. Starmer, the former Director of Public Prosecutions who once oversaw mercy killings on the margins, now plays puppet-master from Downing Street. Neutral? He’s as neutral as a shark in a goldfish bowl.

Of course, this is just the crown jewel in Starmer’s tiara of turds. Remember the £22 billion black hole that wasn’t? The winter fuel betrayal? The endless tax hikes dressed as “fairness”? Lies upon lies, each more threadbare than the last. But this? This is the most egregious, the one that chills the marrow because it’s not about wallets or waiting lists – it’s life and death. A matter of shuffling off the elderly to balance the books, all under the fig leaf of a free vote. When did Labour become the party that engineers quietus for the quietus-challenged? When did “for the many” become “fewer mouths to feed”?

The likes of Dame Meg Hillier are already spitting feathers, calling it a “shadow policymaking process” that evades scrutiny on an issue that could redefine mortality in Britain. And Leadbeater’s camp? They “categorically deny” chats with No. 10. Pull the other one, love – it’s got bells on. As the Lords filibuster with hundreds of amendments this Friday, the stink of this scandal will only grow. But don’t hold your breath for accountability; Starmer’s too busy practising his furrowed brow for the cameras.

So what now, you ask, as the chill wind of December whispers of hemlock on the breeze? Rage, my friends. Rage like Gran on her last legs, refusing the syringe. Demand a full inquiry into these leaks, flood your MP’s inbox with the fury of a thousand Zimmer frames. And when the next election rolls around – 2029, if they don’t rig the calendar – remember: Starmer’s not just a liar; he’s a life-taker in waiting.

In the grand theatre of Westminster, this is Act One of the great cull. Don’t let the curtain fall without a fight.

Yours in unassisted fury,


Ken Palarse

Essential reading for the resistance:

  • The Right to Die? by Derek Humphry – the blueprint they’re bastardising
  • Being Mortal by Atul Gawande – a humane counterpoint to Starmer’s spreadsheet slaughter
  • The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch – because if you’re going to con the public, at least do it with flair


Wednesday, 3 December 2025

The Stasi Would Blush: How Your Labour Government is Hoovering Up Every Tweet, Post and Meme in the Name of “Fighting Misinformation”



Rejoice, citizens of this once-sceptred isle! Big Brother has finally gone official, dropped the pretence, and sent me a lovely letter on Cabinet Office letterhead admitting the bleeding obvious: the Government Communication Service is systematically collecting, storing, and AI-crunching every public social media post you’ve ever made. And yes, that includes your 3 a.m. rant about dinghies in the Channel, your meme of Suella Braverman riding a unicorn, and that time you called the Home Secretary a weapons-grade bellend.

Why are they doing it? To “address potential mis/disinformation”, naturally. Translation: to decide which opinions are allowed to exist in the public square and which must be quietly memory-holed before they upset the approved narrative. The fact that posts about migration are explicitly flagged for “wider thematic reporting” is pure coincidence, comrades. Nothing to see here, move along.

And the cherry on this dystopian cake? They’re packaging up the aggregated fruits of their trawl and shipping it off to “partner governments”. One can only imagine the scene in some windowless room in Langley or Brussels: a civil servant popping open a USB stick marked “British Peasants – Hot Takes 2025” while sipping a flat white and tutting at our collective impertinence.

This isn’t some tinfoil-hatted fantasy. This is the Cabinet Office, in black and white, admitting they’ve built the largest domestic surveillance net in British history and they’re running it through AI faster than you can say “Orwell was an optimist”.

But here’s the delicious part: they still have to pretend to obey the law. GDPR, that glorious European relic we apparently hate now, gives you a handful of rights even Starmer’s Stasi can’t ignore. You can:

  • Object to them processing your data
  • Demand to know exactly what they’ve hoovered up about you
  • Force them to delete it if they no longer have a lawful reason to keep it
  • Restrict processing while they squirm

And the beauty? They’ve given us the email address of the poor sod who has to deal with it:
dpo@cabinetoffice.gov.uk

I suggest you drop them a line.

Every single objection lands on a desk. Every request triggers mandatory logging, paperwork, and internal audits. A thousand polite emails become a headache. Ten thousand become a crisis. A hundred thousand become a scandal that even Laura Kuenssberg can’t ignore.

So do it. Do it today. Flood the inbox. Make them choke on their own red tape.

And when they write back with the usual mealy-mouthed guff about “legitimate public interest”, remember this: the East Germans used the exact same phrase.

Yours in glorious, unapproved defiance,


Ken Palarse

P.S. If you’re reading this on your phone while queueing for a coffee you can no longer afford, share it. Share it everywhere. Every retweet is a middle finger to the machine.

How to submit your objection in 30 seconds (copy, paste, send):

Subject: Formal GDPR Objection & Subject Access Request – Delete My Data

Dear Data Protection Officer,

Under Articles 15, 17, 18 and 21 GDPR I:

  1. Formally object to any processing of my personal data collected from public social media posts.
  2. Require you to provide a full copy of all personal data you hold on me, including any AI-generated profiles or risk scores.
  3. Require you to erase all such data immediately as you have no lawful overriding interest that justifies mass surveillance of political speech.

Yours etc.

Amazon affiliate reads for the resistance (because even rebels pay the leccy):

  • 1984 by George Orwell – still the blueprint they’re following
  • The Gulag Archipelago (abridged) – for when they tell you it can’t happen here
  • Live Not By Lies by Rod Dreher – a handbook for the digitally damned


Tuesday, 2 December 2025

Trial By Jury for Tulip, But Not For Thee or Me


 

It seems that dear old Lammy wants to end trial by jury, he has raised this again today as a means of deflecting from the row over Reeves and Starmer's market manipulation.

Anyhoo, by happenstance Tulip Siddiq (Starmer's ex corruption minister) has been found guilty by a Bangladeshi court of corruption.

How ironic!

The only problem being is that Tulip doesn't agree with the verdict, claiming that it was "farcical and flawed".

For why?

The verdict was decided upon by a judge, not a jury! 

Learn about the history of trial by jury here