Apparently, Number 10 are telling people that we are to bet treated to a performance of "angry" Starmer at the Commons today as he seeks throw Robbins under the bus.
As entertaining or otherwise as this may be, performative anger must not deflect from the fact that this whole security disaster came about because Starmer desperately wanted to appoint Mandelson as ambassador, despite warnings from all and sundry that this was a stupid idea.
No one in their right mind believes that Olly took it upon himself to pass Mandy fit for duty as Ambassador, and not tell Number 10 that he failed vetting!
No 10 is *not disputing* extraordinary claim in @spectator that Rachel Reeves is blocking defence funding because of the MoD’s poor record on ‘gender parity’ issues. Asked twice, the PM’s spokesman declines to comment on ‘speculation’…
"Purple-faced, eyes blazing, Starmer let rip at Sir Lindsay - then whacked his fist on the side of Mr Speaker's throne."
As per Quentin Letts
Starmer is a vindictive, spiteful, thin skinned little man.
🚨 WATCH: The Speaker tells off Keir Starmer for not directly answering Kemi Badenoch's question
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) April 15, 2026
"Prime Minister, it's Prime Minister's questions"#PMQs pic.twitter.com/hS3miGVPSa
"There is no plan, no money and no leadership. Just talk, consultant-crafted sound-bites, catchy video-clips, conference speeches, dressing up for selfies, consistent, careless persecution of veterans and other nonsense. Nothing but LIES."
